REMOTENESS & CONNECTIVITY: HIGHLAND ASIA IN THE WORLD
Remoteness & Connectivity: Highland Asia in the World is a five-year research project (2015-2020) funded by the European Research Council. It is carried out by a team of researchers based at the Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany. Our terrain of inquiry are the highland areas between the Pamirian Knot and the eastern slopes of the Himalayas. These areas are of global concern. What happens in the highlands of Afghanistan and Tajikistan, Kashmir, Tibet, Myanmar, or Northeast India has a worldwide impact. Rich in natural resources and crisscrossed by the borders of rising Asian powers, a multitude of stakes and analytic positions are attached to these frontiers; they are alternatively seen as realms of authentic culture, as rural peripheries in need of development, and as trafficking routes and sanctuaries for insurgents. Public imaginaries oscillate between such simplistic assessments and local communities continue to feel misunderstood. Our starting hypothesis is that remoteness and connectivity constitute each other in particular ways. Our aim is to analyse this nexus of remoteness and connectivity and thereby lay the groundwork for a new apprehension of the role and position of remote frontiers in general.
CHINA MADE: ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURES AND THE ‘CHINA MODEL’ OF DEVELOPMENT
Over the past decade, China has invested tremendously in infrastructure development, resulting in dramatic social and cultural changes in both rural and urban regions. It has also promoted an infrastructural development model beyond its borders as part of a newly aggressive foreign policy. China Made is a partnership between the Center for Asian Studies (CAS) at the University of Colorado Boulder and the Hong Kong Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences at the University of Hong Kong (HKIHSS), and is supported by an Asian Responsive Grant from The Henry Luce Foundation. China Made will explore both the domestic and international dimension of China’s infrastructure development. The project is also meant to shift the academic focus from broader geopolitical and international relations perspectives to a finer grained analysis of the infrastructures themselves and the on-the-ground social and cultural dimensions of their construction. It will involve three academic conferences – two hosted by CAS and one hosted by HKIHSS – postdoctoral and graduate research positions, and the development of online scholarly resources for project participants and the broader academic community.
CONFIGURATIONS OF “REMOTENESS” (CoRe) – ENTANGLEMENTS OF HUMANS AND TRASPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE BAIKAL-AMUR MAINLINDE (BAM) REGION
Configurations of “Remoteness” (CoRe) – Entanglements of Humans and Transportation Infrastructure in the Baikal-Amur Mainline (BAM) Region is a research project (2015-2020) based at the Institute for Cultural and Social Anthropology, University of Vienna and funded by the Austrian Science Fund FWF [P 27625 Einzelprojekte].Project leader Peter Schweitzer and team members Olga Povoroznyuk, Gertrude Saxinger, Alexis Sancho-Reinoso and Sigrid Schiesser, in cooperation with local researchers and institutions, investigate the effects of the railroad built in the late Soviet period in Eastern Siberia and the Russian Far East. The research conducted among different population groups, including indigenous people, Soviet settlers and recent migrants, aims to inquire who are the ‘winners’ and the ‘losers’ of infrastructural development in a long-term historical perspective. Our key research question is: Given the technosocial entanglement of people and infrastructure, how do changes in remote transportation systems affect human sociality and mobility? The project consists of three distinct social anthropology components and one integration geography component. It employs a mixed methods approach and combines ethnographic fieldwork with a macro-scale analysis of population dynamics and mobility patterns in order to draw a comprehensive picture of the social change along the BAM.
More details and news about the CoRe can be found on the project website.
The CoRe research results are also disseminated on the popular science web portal “Life of BAM”
INFRASTRUCTURES OF DEMOCRACY: STATE BUILDING AS EVERYDAY PRACTICE IN NEPAL’S AGRARIAN DISTRICTS
Infrastructures of Democracy: State Building as Everyday Practice in Nepal’s Agrarian Districts, is a research project funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The project is comprised of several nested scales of collaboration. Core research teams are based at the University of Toronto and the University of British Columbia (co-PIs and affiliated doctoral students) and at the Martin Chautari Research and Policy Institute in Kathmandu, Nepal (Research Fellow and Tribhuvan University doctoral students). One to two peer researchers participate from three district-scale research sites in Nepal. Launched in 2015, Infrastructures of Democracy employs comparative ethnographic methods and deliberative public engagement to explore how people enact and participate in ‘democracy’ in contexts of governmental transition. Following the end of a decade-long civil conflict, local institutions emerged as key sites of on-going struggle over democratic futures in Nepal. In a country characterized by challenging topographies and smallholder agrarian livelihoods it is unsurprising that many of those struggles are waged around the governance of infrastructure development.
Through a focus on infrastructure governance, the research explores how everyday practices at the sub-national scale constitute state building, and how they enable or constrain transformative social change. “Infrastructures of Democracy’ references the contested physical infrastructures (especially the project’s topical focus on rural roads), as well as the social infrastructures through which governance transpires and aspirations for democracy are pursued. In so doing, the research engages with the interdisciplinary literatures on the ‘politics and poetics of infrastructure’ and on the governmentality and cultural politics of development.